![]() |
Fleet Award for Driver Training 2001-02, 03, 04 & 05 |
|
Portable in-car technology - what are the risks and rewards?29 September 2006A five-point safety action plan has been devised by DriveTech (UK) to help ensure that motorists exposure to road risk is limited while they benefit from the use of portable in-car driving aids to improve business efficiency. The advice, coupled with a list of ‘pros’ and ‘cons’ highlighting the benefits and concerns surrounding the ever-growing use of portable satellite navigation systems, traffic monitoring systems and speed camera detectors, comes as latest Government data reveals that ‘failing to look properly’ is the most frequently reported contributory factor to crashes. With at-work vehicles increasingly being turned into ‘mobile offices’, the Department for Transport’s latest annual report on road casualty statistics analyses contributory factors to road crashes for the first time. ‘Failing to look properly’ headed the list being involved in 32% of all crashes in 2005, according to the report. Five of the six most frequently reported contributory factors were some kind of driver or rider error or reaction. For fatal accidents the most frequently reported contributory factor was loss of control, which was involved in 35% of fatal accidents. Officials examined the reason(s) behind 147,509 crashes on UK roads last year. DriveTech (UK), the country’s leading provider of at-work driving risk management, driver assessment and driver training solutions, believes that the incorrect use and placement of portable in-car information technology increases the likelihood of at-work drivers being involved in a crash as they become distracted by the technology and ultimately lose control of their vehicle. Managing director Jim Kirkwood said: “Today, many fleet managers are faced with a dilemma - whether to encourage the use of portable in-car aids to improve business efficiency or whether to discourage their use on the basis that they can increase a driver’s exposure to occupational road risk. “We believe that portable ‘sat-nav’, traffic monitoring systems and speed camera detectors, like mobile phones, are a significant added distraction while driving. This, in turn, potentially increases the driver’s exposure to risk behind the wheel, particularly in the first few days of use.” However, DriveTech (UK) does not believe that such technology should be banned. Mr Kirkwood said: “We live in the ‘real world’ and accept that these technologies can be used legally and legitimately under existing road safety law even though there is growing evidence that they are a distraction to drivers. “We therefore recommend that each individual company undertakes a risk assessment and balances the benefits against the risks and includes their recommendation in the company’s car policy.” With factory-fitted driving aids, vehicle manufacturers spend millions of pounds ensuring the technology meets rigorous ergonomic and safety standards. This means that devices are located in the optimum place to ensure drivers remain focused on the road ahead and their attention is not diverted to an ill-placed system. Additionally, satellite navigation devices fitted on the production line can only be programmed when the vehicle is stationary with limited functionality available to the driver when on the move unlike some aftermarket devices. DriveTech (UK)’s ‘pros’ and ‘cons’ In favour
Against
DriveTech (UK)’s five-point action plan if a company permits portable in-car technology
EDITOR’S NOTES |
| privacy policy | terms of website use | site design by fresca | accessibility | site map |